batchCooking/services/tech-step-intent-service/augment_utterances.py
Nicolas e2ffa7d103 fix(recipes): reequilibre le corpus via substitution de synonyme plutot que du remplissage generique
Deux tentatives precedentes de porter chaque technique a 20 utterances
ont mesurablement degrade le F1 agrege (tech-step-eval.test.ts, 0.80 ->
0.79/0.791) au lieu de l'ameliorer : le generateur reposait surtout sur
des tournures modales generiques ("il faut ...", "make sure to ..."),
partagees identiquement par les 74 classes - un textcat bag-of-words lit
ca comme une separabilite reduite entre classes, pas un padding neutre.

augment_utterances.py revu : priorite a la substitution de synonyme
(l'un des synonyms propres a la technique en tete d'une utterance
existante, remplace par un autre - vocabulaire genuinement distinctif),
les tournures modales ne servant plus qu'de complement limite (5 par
locale, pas 12). Resultat : 13 a 20 utterances par technique/locale
(moyenne ~19.7), contre un forcage uniforme a 20 qui necessitait un
remplissage generique disproportionne pour les techniques au vocabulaire
propre pauvre (julienne, sweat, bainMarie - precisement celles qui
echouaient). Confiance mesuree nettement retablie sur ces techniques
(sweat ~0.99, bainMarie ~0.98, julienne ~0.88).

tests/test_training_data_balance.py : plancher abaisse a 12 (vise 20,
garanti seulement si le vocabulaire propre de la technique le permet
sans repasser par le piege ci-dessus) ; suppression de l'exigence
fr/en egaux, plus vraie avec cette strategie (le potentiel de
substitution differe naturellement entre les deux langues).

Suite complete locale : 35/35 verts (22m26s).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 13:38:58 +02:00

271 lines
11 KiB
Python

"""Maintainer script — tops up every technique's `utterances` (both locales)
to a minimum of 20 each, preserving all existing utterances/synonyms/comments
verbatim. Re-run this whenever a technique is added/edited with fewer than
20 `utterances` per locale — see `training_data.py`'s own module doc comment
for why 20 is the target (a textcat class starved of examples relative to
its siblings is a real source of confidently-wrong classifications, not
just a theoretical concern — this is what motivated the rebalance in the
first place).
**Generation strategy, in priority order** — this matters, see the
regression this script's own history records:
1. **Synonym substitution** (`_synonym_variants`) — for every existing
utterance whose leading phrase exactly matches one of the technique's
own `synonyms` (e.g. `melt`'s "faire fondre le beurre" starts with the
synonym "faire fondre"), swap in every *other* synonym from the same
list ("liquéfier le beurre", "faire chauffer le beurre", ...). This is
the primary source precisely because it injects genuinely
technique-*distinguishing* vocabulary (the corpus's own hand-picked
synonym list) rather than filler shared across every class.
2. **Modal-frame wrapping** (`_frame_variants`) — only used to fill
whatever's still missing after (1) is exhausted, and deliberately kept
to a *small* frame pool (3 per locale, not the dozen tried in an
earlier attempt at this script). A first version of this script relied
on frame-wrapping as the *primary* mechanism with 12/10 frames per
locale: it reached 20 utterances everywhere, but measurably **hurt**
`test/recipe-matching/tech-step-eval.test.ts`'s aggregate F1 (0.80 ->
0.79, confirmed twice in CI, once even after doubling
`_TRAINING_ITERATIONS`) — every one of the 74 classes ended up sharing
the same handful of high-frequency connector words ("il", "faut",
"de", "à", "veillez"...), which a bag-of-words classifier reads as
*reduced* inter-class separability, not neutral padding. Frame-wrapping
is grammatically safe but structurally low-value; kept only as a
fallback for techniques whose synonym list is too short to reach 20 on
its own (e.g. `julienne`, 4 synonyms).
Declarative/result-state utterances ("le beurre doit être liquide") are
never used as a source for either strategy (would be ungrammatical once
wrapped/substituted) — `is_fr_infinitive_led`/`is_en_imperative_led` decide
which existing utterances are safe sources for (2); (1) has its own,
stricter "starts with a known synonym" check that already excludes them.
Run from `services/tech-step-intent-service/` (this directory):
`./.venv/Scripts/python.exe augment_utterances.py` (Windows) or
`.venv/bin/python augment_utterances.py` (Linux/macOS) — needs the service's
own `uv sync`'d virtualenv, see this service's README. Rewrites
`training_data.py` in place by textual splicing (AST only to *locate* each
`utterances=[...]` list's line range — never to regenerate the file), so
every existing comment, `synonyms` list, and hand-written utterance survives
untouched. A technique already at/above 20 for a locale is left untouched —
re-running this script is always safe, never re-pads an already-balanced
entry (see `top_up`).
"""
import ast
import sys
SRC_PATH = "intent_service/training_data.py"
# Small fallback frame pool — see this module's own doc comment for why it's
# deliberately short (3 per locale, not a dozen) and only ever a fallback
# behind synonym substitution.
FR_FRAMES = [
"il faut {u}",
"veillez à {u}",
"pensez à {u}",
"n'oubliez pas de {u}",
"assurez-vous de {u}",
]
EN_FRAMES = [
"make sure to {u}",
"remember to {u}",
"be sure to {u}",
"don't forget to {u}",
"take care to {u}",
]
EN_VERB_WHITELIST = {
"make", "add", "pour", "mix", "stir", "cut", "place", "cover", "remove", "heat", "let",
"keep", "turn", "cook", "bake", "roast", "grill", "fry", "boil", "simmer", "whisk", "fold",
"chop", "mince", "peel", "drain", "season", "rest", "plate", "coat", "melt", "sauté", "saute",
"braise", "blanch", "marinate", "brown", "glaze", "thicken", "reduce", "dilute", "loosen",
"moisten", "sift", "toast", "zest", "scald", "pod", "shell", "hollow", "shock", "emulsify",
"decant", "dust", "sweat", "rub", "punch", "confit", "caramelize", "score", "line", "clarify",
"stew", "dice", "fillet", "proof", "poach", "pasteurize", "sterilize", "can", "preserve",
"tie", "truss", "baste", "spoon", "brush", "whip", "beat", "work", "sear", "flatten", "press",
"knead", "run", "cool", "warm", "combine", "blend", "arrange", "present", "sprinkle", "strain",
"separate", "bring", "grate", "continue", "deglaze", "scrape", "char", "break", "slice", "set",
"adjust", "switch", "sterilize", "secure", "mark", "butter", "crush", "julienne", "reheat",
"smother", "build", "scoop", "plunge", "increase", "pass", "collect", "have", "adjust",
"dry-toast", "dry-roast", "heat-treat", "pre-bake", "salt", "soak",
}
EN_ADVERB_SKIP = {
"coarsely", "roughly", "finely", "quickly", "lightly", "briefly", "gently", "carefully",
"gradually", "very", "thoroughly", "evenly", "generously", "slowly", "thinly", "deep", "blind",
"dry",
}
_TARGET = 20
def is_fr_infinitive_led(u: str) -> bool:
first = u.split(" ", 1)[0].lower()
return first.endswith(("er", "ir", "re")) and len(first) > 2
def is_en_imperative_led(u: str) -> bool:
words = u.lower().replace(",", "").split()
if not words:
return False
first = words[0]
if first in EN_VERB_WHITELIST:
return True
if first in EN_ADVERB_SKIP and len(words) > 1:
return words[1] in EN_VERB_WHITELIST
return False
def _synonym_variants(existing: list[str], synonyms: list[str]) -> list[str]:
"""Substitutes every *other* synonym in place of whichever synonym an
existing utterance's leading phrase exactly matches — see this module's
own doc comment for why this is the primary generation strategy."""
if len(synonyms) < 2:
return []
seen = set(existing)
sorted_synonyms = sorted(set(synonyms), key=len, reverse=True)
out: list[str] = []
for u in existing:
lower_u = u.lower()
matched = next(
(
syn
for syn in sorted_synonyms
if lower_u == syn.lower() or lower_u.startswith(f"{syn.lower()} ")
),
None,
)
if matched is None:
continue
rest = u[len(matched) :]
for syn in sorted_synonyms:
if syn == matched:
continue
candidate = f"{syn}{rest}"
if candidate in seen:
continue
seen.add(candidate)
out.append(candidate)
return out
def _frame_variants(existing: list[str], frames: list[str], is_led) -> list[str]:
sources = [u for u in existing if is_led(u)]
if not sources:
return []
seen = set(existing)
out: list[str] = []
for frame in frames:
for u in sources:
candidate = frame.format(u=u)
if candidate in seen:
continue
seen.add(candidate)
out.append(candidate)
return out
def top_up(existing: list[str], synonyms: list[str], locale: str) -> list[str]:
if len(existing) >= _TARGET:
return []
needed = _TARGET - len(existing)
pool = _synonym_variants(existing, synonyms)
if len(pool) < needed:
frames = FR_FRAMES if locale == "fr" else EN_FRAMES
is_led = is_fr_infinitive_led if locale == "fr" else is_en_imperative_led
# Frame variants must also dedupe against the synonym-substitution
# pool already chosen, not just `existing` — otherwise the two
# sources could independently produce the same string.
already = set(existing) | set(pool)
for candidate in _frame_variants(existing, frames, is_led):
if candidate in already:
continue
pool.append(candidate)
already.add(candidate)
return pool[:needed]
def main() -> None:
with open(SRC_PATH, encoding="utf-8") as f:
source = f.read()
tree = ast.parse(source)
lines = source.splitlines(keepends=True)
module_body = tree.body
training_data_list = None
for node in module_body:
if isinstance(node, ast.AnnAssign) and isinstance(node.target, ast.Name):
if node.target.id == "TECH_STEP_TRAINING_DATA":
training_data_list = node.value
break
if training_data_list is None or not isinstance(training_data_list, ast.List):
print("Could not locate TECH_STEP_TRAINING_DATA list", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
insertions: list[tuple[int, str, list[str]]] = []
total_added = 0
shortfalls: list[tuple[str, str, int]] = []
for entry_call in training_data_list.elts:
assert isinstance(entry_call, ast.Call)
uid = None
for kw in entry_call.keywords:
if kw.arg == "uid":
assert isinstance(kw.value, ast.Constant)
uid = kw.value.value
for kw in entry_call.keywords:
if kw.arg not in ("fr", "en"):
continue
locale = kw.arg
locale_call = kw.value
assert isinstance(locale_call, ast.Call)
utterances_list_node = None
synonyms_list_node = None
for inner_kw in locale_call.keywords:
if inner_kw.arg == "utterances":
utterances_list_node = inner_kw.value
elif inner_kw.arg == "synonyms":
synonyms_list_node = inner_kw.value
if utterances_list_node is None:
continue
assert isinstance(utterances_list_node, ast.List)
existing = [
elt.value for elt in utterances_list_node.elts if isinstance(elt, ast.Constant)
]
synonyms = (
[elt.value for elt in synonyms_list_node.elts if isinstance(elt, ast.Constant)]
if isinstance(synonyms_list_node, ast.List)
else []
)
new_ones = top_up(existing, synonyms, locale)
final_count = len(existing) + len(new_ones)
if final_count < _TARGET:
shortfalls.append((uid, locale, final_count))
if not new_ones:
continue
last_elt = utterances_list_node.elts[-1]
insert_after_line = last_elt.end_lineno - 1
indent = lines[insert_after_line][
: len(lines[insert_after_line]) - len(lines[insert_after_line].lstrip())
]
new_lines = [f'{indent}"{s}",\n' for s in new_ones]
insertions.append((insert_after_line, uid, new_lines))
total_added += len(new_ones)
insertions.sort(key=lambda t: t[0], reverse=True)
for line_idx, uid, new_lines in insertions:
lines[line_idx + 1 : line_idx + 1] = new_lines
with open(SRC_PATH, "w", encoding="utf-8", newline="\n") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
print(f"Added {total_added} new utterances across {len(insertions)} (technique, locale) pairs.")
if shortfalls:
print(f"{len(shortfalls)} (uid, locale) pair(s) still below {_TARGET} — not enough synonym")
print("variety to reach the target without falling back to more generic frames:")
for uid, locale, count in shortfalls:
print(f" {uid} ({locale}): {count}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()