## Error handling
Requested: a centralized error-handling service on the API, custom error
codes shared across apps, and a client-side error service for i18n labels.
- packages/shared/src/errors/error-codes.ts — ErrorCode enum + ApiErrorResponse
contract. Single source of truth: neither side hardcodes a raw error string
the other has to guess at.
- apps/api: HttpError now carries an ErrorCode (not just a message).
ErrorHandlerService (new) centralizes every "how do we turn a thrown error
into an HTTP response" decision — app.ts's error middleware is now a thin
adapter calling into it. API messages reverted to English/dev-facing (they
were French from an earlier pass) since user-facing text is now generated
client-side from the code.
- apps/web: ApiClient (class, singleton instance) throws ApiError carrying
the code. ErrorMessageService (new) maps every ErrorCode to a localized
label, structured with a Locale type from the start (only "fr" exists, but
adding a language later is "add a locale to the map", not "hunt down every
hardcoded string"). LoginPage/SignupPage now display
errorMessageService.getLabel(err.code), never err.message directly.
- Tests strengthened to assert on `code`, not just HTTP status (Mocha +
Cucumber, new "the response error code should be" step). Cypress mocks
updated to the new {code, message} response shape.
## Code quality pass
Per explicit feedback: heavy JSDoc on every interface/type/class/function/
method/member touched in this PR, explicit public/private visibility on
every class member (ApiClient, ErrorMessageService, ErrorHandlerService,
HttpError), no HTML/logic mixing (styling extracted out of components
entirely, never inline).
ApiClient/ErrorMessageService were initially written as static-only classes;
switched to instance-based singletons (matching ErrorHandlerService's
existing pattern) after Biome's noStaticOnlyClass rule flagged the
static-only shape as an anti-pattern — same "class with visibility
modifiers" outcome, without fighting the linter.
## SCSS + theming
- apps/web/src/styles/_theme.scss — design tokens as CSS custom properties
on :root (colors, spacing, typography), not plain Sass variables — makes
them available at runtime, not just compile time, so a future theme
switch (e.g. dark mode) is "redefine these variables" rather than
rebuilding stylesheets.
- apps/web/src/styles/global.scss replaces the old single index.css:
reset + theme import only, loaded once from main.tsx.
- Per-page/component styles colocated (HomePage.tsx + HomePage.scss);
styles shared by multiple pages within one feature live in that feature's
folder (features/auth/auth-form.scss, used by both Login/SignupPage) —
not duplicated per page, not dumped in the global stylesheet either.
- Component-level .scss files intentionally don't `@use` the theme
partial: they only consume CSS custom properties (global at runtime via
global.scss), not Sass-level symbols, so importing it would do nothing —
documented inline rather than left as a silently-redundant import.
- vite.config.ts opts into Sass's modern compiler API to silence a
legacy-js-api deprecation warning on every build.
## specs/ updates
- New specs/error-handling.md — the ErrorCode/ApiErrorResponse contract,
both services, with a flow diagram.
- New specs/frontend-architecture.md — apps/web folder structure, routing/
auth-guard flow, SCSS/theming conventions.
- specs/batch-cooking-architecture.md links to both (original doc content
otherwise untouched — it's the user's own hand-authored source doc).
## Verification
Full lint/mocha/cucumber/build green. Manually re-verified the whole auth
flow in a real browser against native dev servers (not just the automated
suites): signup, the EMAIL_ALREADY_IN_USE → "Cet email est déjà utilisé"
translation end-to-end (confirmed the raw API response carries the English
dev message + code, and the UI shows the French label), wrong-password
INVALID_CREDENTIALS → its label, and confirmed the theme tokens actually
apply (computed button background-color matches --color-primary, card
max-width matches the token value) rather than trusting the build succeeding.
* Add project specs, gitignore the source PDF
specs/batch-cooking-architecture.md and specs/batch-cooking-modele.md
are the clean markdown transcription of "Projet batch cooking.pdf"
(a scanned/image-only PDF, no extractable text). The PDF itself is
gitignored — source working document, not meant to be committed.
* Add Prisma schema for the documented data model
Models every table from specs/batch-cooking-modele.md: users/household
(user_profiles, house, diet, allergy, category), planning (planning,
planning_item), and recipes (recipe, ingredients, step, tech_step,
tech_step_mapping, sources).
Two deliberate deviations from the literal spec doc, per project
discussion:
- recipe_ingredient (recipe <-> ingredients) carries quantity + unit.
The spec describes a plain many-to-many with no extra fields, but a
shopping list / batch-cooking calculation needs quantities.
- step is modeled one-to-many from recipe (not many-to-many as labeled
in the doc): the documented `order` column only makes sense scoped
to a single recipe, which isn't reconcilable with steps being
shared across recipes.
Everything else follows the doc as-is, including field nullability
choices made where the doc doesn't specify (e.g. user_profiles.house_id
optional, recipe.source_id optional) and onDelete behavior (Cascade
for owned child records, SetNull for optional references) — first
draft, not meant as final production hardening.
Verified: `prisma validate`, `prisma generate`, and a real
`prisma migrate dev` against a local Postgres (via docker-compose) —
the migration applies cleanly and produces the expected schema.
README: documents the migrate command and a Postgres port-conflict
gotcha hit during validation (a native Postgres service on this
machine was already bound to 5432, intercepting the Docker container's
connections).
* Add COMMENT ON for every table and column in the init migration
Descriptions pulled from specs/batch-cooking-modele.md's per-table
field tables. The two tables not in the original spec (join tables
recipe_ingredient, user_profile_allergy) get a comment explaining
why they exist.
Amends the still-unmerged init migration directly rather than adding
a follow-up migration, since it hasn't been applied anywhere but this
local dev database.
Verified: `prisma migrate reset --force` reapplies cleanly, and a
query against pg_description confirms every column of every project
table has a comment (only Prisma's own internal _prisma_migrations
table is uncommented, out of scope).
kyuno053
